actbiotechАктуальная биотехнологияTopical biotechnology2304-4691ВГУИТ10.20914/2304-4691-2020-3-282-284actbiotech-4851Research ArticleСтатьиАНТИМИКРОБНАЯ И РАНОЗАЖИВЛЯЮЩАЯ АКТИВНОСТЬ ХИТОЗАН-ИММОБИЛИЗОВАННОГО ФИЦИНАБайдамшинаД. Р.noemail@neicon.ruТризнаЕ. Ю.noemail@neicon.ruХолявкаМ. Г.noemail@neicon.ruКаюмовА. Р.noemail@neicon.ruКазанский (Приволжский) федеральный университетRussian FederationВоронежский государственный университетRussian Federation20202609202003282284Copyright © Байдамшина Д.Р., Тризна Е.Ю., Холявка М.Г., Каюмов А.Р., 20202020Байдамшина Д.Р., Тризна Е.Ю., Холявка М.Г., Каюмов А.Р.Байдамшина Д.Р., Тризна Е.Ю., Холявка М.Г., Каюмов А.Р.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.actbio-vsuet.ru/jour/article/view/4851ReferencesShah D., Mital K. The role of trypsin: chymotrypsin in tissue repair //Advances in therapy. 2018. Т. 35. -№. 1. -С. 31-42.Shah D., Mital K. The role of trypsin: chymotrypsin in tissue repair //Advances in therapy. 2018. Т. 35. -№. 1. -С. 31-42.Chandanwale A. et al. A randomized, clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of trypsin: chymotrypsin as compared to serratiopeptidase and trypsin: bromelain: rutoside in wound management //Advances in therapy. -2017. -Т. 34. -№. 1. - С. 180-198.Chandanwale A. et al. A randomized, clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of trypsin: chymotrypsin as compared to serratiopeptidase and trypsin: bromelain: rutoside in wound management //Advances in therapy. -2017. -Т. 34. -№. 1. - С. 180-198.Kirker K.R., James G.A. In vitro studies evaluating the effects of biofilms on wound-healing cells: a review //Apmis. -2017. - Т. 125. -№.Kirker K.R., James G.A. In vitro studies evaluating the effects of biofilms on wound-healing cells: a review //Apmis. -2017. - Т. 125. -№.Malone M. et al. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data //Journal of Wound Care. -2017. -Т. 26. -№. 1. -С. 20-25.Malone M. et al. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data //Journal of Wound Care. -2017. -Т. 26. -№. 1. -С. 20-25.Percival S.L. et al. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds //Wound repair and regeneration. -2012. -Т.Percival S.L. et al. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds //Wound repair and regeneration. -2012. -Т.Roy S. et al. Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function //The Journal of pathology. -2014. -Т. 233. -№.Roy S. et al. Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function //The Journal of pathology. -2014. -Т. 233. -№.Minaev B.F. Electronic mechanisms of molecular oxygen activation //Russ. Chem. Rev. -2007. Т. 76. №. 11. С. 989-1011.Minaev B.F. Electronic mechanisms of molecular oxygen activation //Russ. Chem. Rev. -2007. Т. 76. №. 11. С. 989-1011.Wang J. et al. Functional and bioinformatics analysis of an exopolysaccharide-relatedgene (epsN) from Lactobacillus kefiranofaciensZW3 //Archives of microbiology. -2016. -Т. 198. -№. 7. -С. 611-618.Wang J. et al. Functional and bioinformatics analysis of an exopolysaccharide-relatedgene (epsN) from Lactobacillus kefiranofaciensZW3 //Archives of microbiology. -2016. -Т. 198. -№. 7. -С. 611-618.Klasen H.J. A review on the nonoperative removal of necrotic tissue from burn wounds //Burns. -2000. -Т. 26. -№. 3. - С. 207-222.Klasen H.J. A review on the nonoperative removal of necrotic tissue from burn wounds //Burns. -2000. -Т. 26. -№. 3. - С. 207-222.Baidamshina D.R. et al. Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease //Scientific reports. -2017.Baidamshina D.R. et al. Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease //Scientific reports. -2017.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.